A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon by the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined because of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of in the future while in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained via the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness on the alleged event and the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened for being the real brothers of your deceased but they didn't respond in any respect to the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not seem much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on lots of instances that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak form of evidence which could be manoeuvred through the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is also counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding existence of some light on the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners collectively with a motorcycle at 4.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are with the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally seem, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really subject matter to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion may be regarded as, however, we have been obvious inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject to your approval from the competent authority.
Individual researchers working on defined research projects supposed for scholarly work can make use of the attached form (PDF) to request PACER fee exemptions from multiple courts.
82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Legislation professors traditionally have played a much smaller role in producing case legislation in common regulation than professors in civil law. Because court decisions in civil regulation traditions are historically brief[4] rather than formally amenable to establishing precedent, much in the exposition with the regulation in civil law traditions is finished by academics somewhat than by judges; this is called doctrine and may be published in treatises or in journals for example Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common regulation courts relied minimal on legal scholarship; Hence, within the turn in the twentieth century, it absolutely was extremely unusual to determine an educational writer quoted in a very legal decision (except Most likely for your educational writings of well known judges for example Coke and Blackstone).
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar difficulty. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in implementing the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases heard while in the state court, for the same level.
Section 302 of your PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be matter on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case legislation by setting a completely new precedent of higher authority. This might come about several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of the High Court of Justice, later on the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his enhancement click here from the concept of estoppel starting from the High Trees case.
Online access to your statewide search of adult criminal case information while in the juvenile & domestic relations district courts, criminal and traffic case information in general district courts and select circuit courts. Note: Payments cannot be made using this system.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter as being a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) from the Pakistan Constitution offers authentic jurisdiction to the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and prospective hazard to local residents. Ultimately, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, though observing the general craze supports that electromagnetic fields have unfavorable effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle established out within the 1992 Rio Declaration over the Environment and Improvement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.